A rare type of arrangement that phonologically copies parts of the head instead of agreeing with a grammatical category. [4] For example, in Bainouk: a mutual error occurs when the parties are wrong about the same material fact in their treaty. They are multi-purpose. There is a meeting of minds, but the parties are wrong. Therefore, the contract is in null and void. Such a concordance is also found with predictors: man is tall (“man is great”) vs. the chair is large (“the chair is large”). (In some languages, such as German. B, that is not the case; only the attribute modifiers show the agreement.) If the expected costs for each party pursuing a contract outweigh the expected benefit, both parties are encouraged to forego the transaction in the first place or to commit to mutually cancelling the contract. This can happen when market conditions or other relevant conditions change over the course of the contract. In Hungarian, verbs have a polypersonal concordance, which means that they correspond to more than one of the arguments of the verb: not only its subject, but also its object (accusative). There is a difference between the case where a particular object is present and the case where the object is indeterminate or if there is no object at all.
(Adverbs have no influence on the form of the verb.) Examples: Szeretek (I love someone or something indeterminate), szeretem (I love him, she, or her, or her, specifically), szeretlek (I love you); szeret (he loves me, me, you, someone or something indeterminate), szereti (he loves him, her or her especially). Of course, names or pronouns can specify the exact object. In short, there is agreement between a verb and the person and the number of its subject and the specificity of its object (which often refers more or less precisely to the person). Empty contracts may arise if one of the parties is unable to fully understand the effects of the agreement. For example, a person with a mental disability or an intoxicated person may not be consistent enough to properly record the parameters of the agreement, rendering it invalid. In addition, agreements made by minors may be considered unseable; However, some contracts with minors who have obtained the consent of a parent or legal guardian may be enforceable. For a reciprocal error in cancelling the agreement, the fact that the parties are wrong must be essential. For example, if you and I are flawless on the weight of a machine, shipping costs have increased by 5%, which is probably not a hardware error. But if you and I didn`t know that the purchased machine couldn`t perform the function it acquired to run it, it`s probably a major mistake. Material error: if the two parties enter into an agreement, they are indeed wrong on an issue essential to the agreement, the agreement is at the end of the contract.
In nomine sentences, the adjectives do not show a match with the noun, although pronouns do. z.B. a szép k-nyveitekkel “with your beautiful books” (“szép”: nice): the suffixes of the plural, the possessive “your” and the fall marking “with” are marked only on the name. The defendant can also argue that the contract was signed under duress and added that the applicant had forced him to sign the agreement through threats or the use of physical force. In other cases, both the applicant and the defendant could have made errors that contributed to the breach. Analysis of past agreements – both those that have been successful and those that have not been provided as intended – can help you identify the conditions and clauses that best reduce vulnerabilities. For example, if you compare similar types of contracts that have all led to violations, you may find commonalities in the formulations you can avoid.