When it comes to registration and marking, you need to determine if this is necessary. For incidental purposes, the agreement may be stamped and not recorded. A comparison does not require recording if it is oral. But in order for the written word to be considered legal, registration is a good option, as it is accepted by the courts. . The provisions relating to the acquisition of the voting rights of the target undertakings under a family comparison agreement (hereinafter referred to as ASL). As for these requests, seBI exists with orders of October 8. able to maintain the same membership in four different groups, each led by one of the four brothers, as provided for in the family comparison agreement. The shares with regard to the aforementioned vote. the provisions of Regulations 10, 11 and 12 of those provisions.
1.0 In this regard, four brothers of the Thapar family, Shri Lalit Mohan Thapar, Shri Brij Mohan Thapar, Indian Shri. . That`s right. The petitioner submitted a response to the deportation request, rejecting the defendant plaintiff`s refusals. It was proposed that the family comparison agreement on which the petitioner should be resold. an action for apportionment is pending between the family members with respect to the above-mentioned property and the family transaction agreement, on the basis of which ownership is claimed by the respondent. The family comparison, which took place in 2004, became the owner of the recourse land requested by the plaintiff to use it “as a means” of entering his property and using open land. The agreement is sealed by the acceptance of all family members who firmly accept the solution provided for in the agreement at a later date if such an event occurs, as indicated in the agreement.