6. Which of the following variables can be designated as a nominal variable? (I say it`s supposed, because it doesn`t always work. If that is not the trap, we are saying that the evidence I mentioned below is irrelevant. But in analyzing the evidence, you should be able to say how the author intended to support the evidence, the assertion, even if they were inconclusive. Before you can evaluate, you need to understand what you mean.) 12. The validity in interviews is reinforced by the following EXCEPTION: 7. Secondary data may contain which of the following? The following graph shows the best alternative for each party to a negotiated agreement (seller and buyer): you can also consider the aggregate evidence that could be recorded if you are able to do so and ask if the author has provided a substantial part of it. Let us say, for example, I wanted to prove that the community and technical colleges in Washington are suffering from budget cuts, and I give examples of 15 of the 34 colleges in the state. I quoted almost half of the entire group that was discussed.
For many, this would be enough to show that higher education institutions suffer in general. 15. Among the following results, which is a form of research generally conducted by managers and other professionals to address the problems of their organizations and/or their professional practices? 11. Which of the following does not apply to reflexivity? For example, go back to the car and paint. If I were to ask what form the car is in and the seller refers to the paint, we might get the impression that the evidence of the assertion that it is a good car is not very relevant. 3. Research that aims to examine the results of a study with the same design, but another sample is which of the following? Colin needs a car and negotiates with Tom to buy his car. Tom offers to sell his car to Colin for $10, 000. Colin searches Craigslist and finds a similar car to which he attributes a value of 7,500 dollars. Colin`s BATNA costs $7,500 — if Tom doesn`t offer a price of less than $7,500, Colin will consider his best alternative to a negotiated contract. Colin is willing to pay up to 7,500 $US for the car, but ideally he would only pay $5,000. The relevant information is presented below: 9.
To predict the value of dependent variables for a new case based on the knowledge of one or more independent variables, we would almost always make a mistake to say that there is no way to know. It may be difficult to find out and it could go beyond our knowledge, but with sufficient research, we can almost always determine whether a particular example is representative. In the diagram above, if Tom asks for a price in excess of $7,500, Colin will take his business elsewhere. In the example, we are not supplied with Tom`s BATNA. If Tom is expected to sell his car to someone else for $8,000, it is Tom`s BATNA. In such a scenario, no deal is reached, since Tom is only willing to sell for at least $8,000, while Colin is only willing to buy for a maximum of $7,500. Representative evidence is absolutely necessary. One reason is simple and practical: we rarely have room to take every example of what we were talking about. Therefore, the examples we use should be the most typical and representative examples.