Some relationships, such as a trust or contract of employment, create an inherent duty of good faith. However, there is no delicate obligation to negotiate in good faith under Canadian law. In the absence of one of these special relationships, the court may still consider that an agreement negotiated in good faith is still binding. To the extent that this MOA provides flexibility in provincial tax policy, Ontario becomes a member of the Canada-Ontario CITCA and is bound by changes to Canada`s tax base with respect to GST. However, if Canada proposes a change in the tax base that would result in a reduction of more than one per cent in OVAT revenues (net of provincial rebates and JTIs under this MOA), Canada may only make such an amendment if the Ontario Minister of Finance has written his or her opinion on the amendment prior to implementation. If Canada implements the change in the tax base without consulting Ontario or moves forward without Ontario`s written agreement, Canada agrees to fully compensate Ontario for the revenue reduction for each year in which the change remains in effect and the Canada-Ontario CiTCA remains in effect. In the past, courts have often ruled that this type of agreement is unenforceable. Without an offer, acceptance and consideration, the Tribunal would decide that the agreement is not secure and that there is no valid contract. Recent decisions have shown that the Tribunal will review agreements to reach agreements on a case-by-case basis and will find them binding in certain circumstances. Canada and Ontario agree to make every effort to fulfill the obligations under this MOA to ensure that all political and administrative details, including all necessary legislative procedures and the signing of agreements, are completed by March 31, 2010, unless otherwise specified in this MOA. The main difference between a contract and a memorandum of understanding is applicability.
Contracts are entered into when two or more parties intend to create a legally enforceable agreement. The parties conclude contracts after the adoption of an offer for remuneration. The contracting parties are legally obliged to comply with the terms of the contract. In the event of a breach of a contractual condition, the parties are threatened with legal consequences. Although there are obvious theoretical differences between a contract and a memorandum of understanding, the practical differences between these two agreements may be limited by the intention of the party. An agreement becomes enforceable if there is evidence that the parties intend to create a legally binding agreement. Therefore, the applicability of a declaration of intent depends on the intention of the parties. . .
.